Failure of Imagination

 

Alexander Liss

 

01/20/2009

 

 

 

     The state of Israel needs another political system. The existing system is threatened by the demographic trends and does not provide sufficient control over peoples living at its borders and wanting to overtake the state.

     Such imbalance between future needs of the state and current form of the political system provokes perpetual internal and external challenges.

The peace is based on the balance of force; hence, the state should evoke sufficient fear in its external enemies. They have to fear extension of the state beyond its current borders to suppress external challenges through absorption of neighboring peoples into the state. This means that the state has to have a political form, which allows easy absorption of peoples living at its borders.

     Seeming weakness of the political system, real or imaginary, provokes internal and external enemies of Israel.

Palestinian and many Lebanese communities lack civil organization. This leads to hijacking of these communities by essentially criminal elements and foreign powers, which pursue goals detrimental to their wellbeing. Existing political system does not provide means to establish sufficient control over these communities and provide proper guidance to develop civilized self-governance.

     This political system served well in times of high immigration and perpetual readiness to defend the state against its powerful and determined external enemies. Currently, it is out of balance with new internal and geopolitical circumstances. Still, the country famous for its inventiveness and ingenuity does not make an attempt to change it.

When discussion comes to forms of democratic government, no one wants to venture beyond known few forms of democracy. However, Israel needs a new form of democracy and it could learn from the emergence of a new form of democracy in the United States of America. American form of democracy did not exist before. It was invented by a group of people, who had experience of living in communities with extensive self-governing. This group invented something uniquely applicable to the life in their particular circumstances. Similar thing should be done in Israel.

Democracies have different forms, in different circumstances different forms of democracy are viable.

     A designer of a political system in the state of Israel faces two major problems:

  • the state of Israel cannot afford diversion of political power from Jews to Arabs
  • Jews in Israel and abroad are not treated around the world the same way as other peoples are treated

Jews are treated differently because Jews are different; Jews are “more different” than other strangers. Note that Jews are not “more different” in China or India; Jews are “more different” in Christian and Muslim worlds.

The cause of it is in deeply ingrained worldview, in subconsciously carried culture.

An example should help to understand this. Not religious Jews detect minor transgressions of religious Jews. These transgressions could be real or imaginary, against general morality or against religious laws (they way not religious Jews understand them). This is not because they feel animosity toward religious Jews or carrying the guilt of being not observant Jews. In most cases they feel neither. The cause is deeper. They see religious Jews as representatives of the basis of their culture, of the basis of subconscious, which shapes their emotions, feelings and thoughts. They are naturally scared, when they suspect that there is a deficiency in this basis. They know no tools to fix it.

This is a psychological phenomenon. Even not religious Jews carry the culture shaped by Jewish religion, which was practiced by their ancestors. In our times, being a Jew means carrying this special culture, and it shows in myriads of every day decisions.

Something similar could be observed in relationships between Jews, who carry the ancient foundation of a particular culture and Christians and Muslims, who absorbed this culture and built something on top of it.

Christians and Muslims cannot possible see Jews as similar to other peoples, as not religious Jews cannot see religious Jews as some group of people, which has nothing to do with them. Jews represent the foundation, the basis of their subconscious, something that is beyond their control, but something that shapes their perception and their decision making.

Christian and Muslims feel this, many of them without any conscious understanding of it. Some, who have internal balance, embrace it and love Jews. Others, who are in fight with themselves, from one hand ready to believe that Jews are manipulating the world behind the scene and from the other hand demand from every Jew exceptionally righteous behavior as an assurance that foundation of their culture is in order.

This interplay of cultures is a powerful force. Jews tried to settle in many places. The only variant which worked in long term was a settlement in the land of Israel, a settlement, which comes with perpetual war. Jews had to conquer the Land the way their ancestors did many years ago.

While many Jews could not care less for conquering the entire Land of Israel and want to be left alone and live as other peoples, Christians and Muslims deep in heart see them as such conquers and blame them for disorder in the Land of Israel regardless who causes it.

This is psychological and political reality. In spite of miserable life in Diaspora and Holocaust, Jews are perceived by Christians and Muslims as powerful creatures, representatives of the foundation of their psyche. This is how people around the world feel, and this is extremely important.

The political system of state of Israel has to be in balance with this perception.

It has to be two layered. The Upper layer should be elected by Jews of the state and this layer should set and modify the Lower layer, with goal to bring about self-governance of various communities in the state.

The state should aim to establish its control over all the Land of Israel. In addition, it has to establish control over bordering communities, which cannot self-govern in a civilized way.

The Upper layer should retain key functions as defense, foreign relations, etc. through all political reorganizations caused by growing maturity of the state’s communities and higher degree of their self-governance.

While unusual, this is the most democratic form of government in circumstances of the state of Israel.